🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The final decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in additional member states